skip to main |
skip to sidebar
Vodafone: Egypt forced us to send text messages Excerpts:Egyptian authorities forced Vodafone to broadcast pro-government text messages during the protests that have rocked the country, the U.K.-based mobile company said Thursday.
Micro-blogging site Twitter has been buzzing with screen grabs from Vodafone's Egyptian customers showing text messages sent over the course of the demonstrations against Egyptian President Hosni Mubarak's 30-year-old regime.A text message received Sunday by an Associated Press reporter in Egypt appealed to the country's "honest and loyal men to confront the traitors and criminals and protect our people and honor." Another urged Egyptians to attend a pro-Mubarak rally in Cairo on Wednesday. The first was marked as coming from "Vodafone." The other was signed: "Egypt Lovers."And:The company also said its competitors — including Egypt's Mobinil and the United Arab Emirates' Etisalat — were doing the same. Etisalat, known formally as Emirates Telecommunications Corp., declined comment.Vodafone said the texts had been sent "since the start of the protests," which kicked off more than a week ago. Vodafone did not immediately return an e-mail asking why the company waited nearly 10 days to complain publicly. Its statement was released only after repeated inquiries by the AP.The U.S. is dancing as fast as it can, at the moment, and it seems clear that Mubarak will either go quickly, or hunker down and go violently. Everything about Egypt is politically grey: Mubarak is an American ally, but a non-democratic authoritarian. The protesters might be pro-democratic or (booga booga) Muslim Brotherhood, so we aren't sure who to root for: The dictator, or the potential terrorists? This isn't too much of an exaggeration, is it, considering America's complete loss of nuanced thought.. It will be interesting, if not maddening, I'm sure, to see how both the situation evolves, and how American and Western discourse evolves in their reaction to said events.At this point in time, every day feels a little more fluid than the last.
State-sponsored thuggery, anyone? Violent clashes as Egypt rebels. Excerpts:Supporters of President Hosni Mubarak opened fire on protesters in Cairo’s Tahrir Square on Thursday, killing four people and wounding 13, witnesses and television said.
It was the biggest spike in violence since protesters angered by oppression and hardship launched an unprecedented challenge to Mubarak’s 30-year-rule 10 days ago. Many accused the government of backing the pro-Mubarak supporters. (CNN reporters and Senior US Officials (see below) are saying as much, so "many" is probably an understatement..)..Al Arabiya television quoted a doctor at the scene as saying four people had been killed and 13 were wounded in the overnight violence in Tahrir Square which began around 4 am (0200 GMT) on Thursday, and which was shown live on television...with many saying they would not call off their protests until the 82-year-old president quit, Mubarak backers, throwing petrol bombs, wielding sticks and charging on camels and horses, attacked protesters in Tahrir Square on Wednesday. As terrifying and horrible as this was to experience, the protesters knew it was coming. After all, they're dealing with supporters of a brutal, authoritarian regime, familiar and comfortable with threats, intimidation, torture, and killing. How else would Mubarak's supporters react?..Anti-Mubarak demonstrators said the attackers were police in plainclothes. The Interior Ministry denied the accusation, and the government rejected international calls to end violence and begin the transfer of power...In pointed comments, a senior US official said on Wednesday it was clear that “somebody loyal to Mubarak has unleashed these guys to try to intimidate the protesters”.So the vandalism and looting at the museum might, MIGHT not have been anti-Mubarak protesters? This is again, true to form. Mubarak's supporters share much of their leader's mental inflexibility when dealing with dissent and opposition: Beat their asses back into submission by any means possible. This process is going to get ugly, but this is also a numbers game(not to be flip towards the protesters). Mubarak had to massively rig the last election in order to win. Much more people oppose than support him. The more violent and outrageous Mubarak's supporters behave, the more horrified their neutral(as of yet) countrymen and women become. This violence will ultimately tip the populace against sustaining the regime, simply because the people won't voluntarily expose their neck to Mubarak's boot. When faced with two futures, ultimately the Egyptians will choose a chance(as no future is written in stone) at a free-er, more peaceful future, as opposed to the choice of returning to the repressive past, and now, the vividly violent present and future.Hosni Mubarak will see to it they do.